- Concepts
- Collective behavior
- Perceptual learning
- Judgement and decision making
- Computational models of cognition
Faculty Profile
Robert Goldstone
- Percepts and Concepts Labortory
- Distinguished Professor and Chancellor’s Professor
Psychological and Brain Sciences
Field of study
Education
- Ph.D., University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1991
Research interests
- Most of my current research interests involve the representation and learning of concepts. I conduct psychological experiments on people's acquisition of visually presented concepts, interactions between developing concepts, the influence of concepts on perception, and concept specialization/differentiation. I develop computer simulations (often times, neural network models) to model concept formation and the two-way interaction between our conceptual and perceptual systems.
- In other lines of research, I study judgement, decision making, and comparison processes involving similarity and analogy. I am also interested in educational applications of cognitive psychology.
- Facilities: my laboratory is part of the open, multi-lab work environment on the 6th Floor of the Geology Building. We collectively share 12 Apple computers and 4 PCs for running human subjects, 4 eye trackers, and additional computers for graduate student use. Our laboratory has been funded by National Institute of Health, National Science Foundation grants, and Department of Education grants.
Professional Experience
- Executive Editor, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2019-2024
- Director of the Indiana University Cognitive Science Program, 2006-2011
- Executive Editor of Cognitive Science, 2001-2005; Board of Reviewers, 2006-2014
Awards
- Howard Crosby Warren Medal for Outstanding Achievement in Experimental Psychology, 2024, Society for Experimental Psychologists.
- Outstanding Graduate Mentor Award, Indiana University Cognitive Science Program, 2021
- Elected Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2016
- National Academy of Sciences Troland research award for “novel experimental analyses and elegant modeling that show how perceptual learning dynamically adjusts dimensions and boundaries of categories and concepts in human thought”, 2004
- American Psychological Association (APA) Distinguished Scientific Award for Early Career Contribution to Psychology in the area of Cognition and Human Learning, 2000.
- Chase Memorial Award from Carnegie Mellon University for Outstanding Young Researcher in Cognitive Science, 1996
- APA Division of Experimental Psychology 1995 Young Investigator Award in Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
- APA Division of Experimental Psychology 1995 Young Investigator Award in Experimental Psychology: General
- Marquis Award for Most Outstanding Dissertation in Psychology, University of Michigan, 1991
Representative publications
Respects for similarity (1993)
Douglas L Medin, Robert L Goldstone and Dedre Gentner
Psychological review, 100 (2), 254
This article reviews the status of similarity as an explanatory construct with a focus on similarity judgments. For similarity to be a useful construct, one must be able to specify the ways or respects in which two things are similar. One solution to this problem is to restrict the notion of similarity to hard-wired perceptual processes. It is argued that this view is too narrow and limiting. Instead, it is proposed that an important source of constraints derives from the similarity comparison process itself. Both new experiments and other evidence are described that support the idea that respects are determined by processes internal to comparisons.
Perceptual learning (1998)
Robert L Goldstone
Annual Reviews. 49 (1), 585-612
Abstract Perceptual learning involves relatively long-lasting changes to an organism's perceptual system that improve its ability to respond to its environment. Four mechanisms of perceptual learning are discussed: attention weighting, imprinting, differentiation, and unitization. By attention weighting, perception becomes adapted to tasks and environments by increasing the attention paid to important dimensions and features. By imprinting, receptors are developed that are specialized for stimuli or parts of stimuli. By differentiation, stimuli that were once indistinguishable become psychologically separated. By unitization, tasks that originally required detection of several parts are accomplished by detecting a single constructed unit representing a complex configuration. Research from cognitive psychology, psychophysics, neuroscience, expert/novice differences, development, computer science, and cross-cultural …
The development of features in object concepts (1998)
Philippe G Schyns, Robert L Goldstone and Jean-Pierre Thibaut
Behavioral and brain Sciences, 21 (1), 17-Jan
According to one productive and influential approach to cognition, categorization, object recognition, and higher level cognitive processes operate on a set of fixed features, which are the output of lower level perceptual processes. In many situations, however, it is the higher level cognitive process being executed that influences the lower level features that are created. Rather than viewing the repertoire of features as being fixed by low-level processes, we present a theory in which people create features to subserve the representation and categorization of objects. Two types of category learning should be distinguished. Fixed space category learning occurs when new categorizations are representable with the available feature set. Flexible space category learning occurs when new categorizations cannot be represented with the features available. Whether fixed or flexible …
Influences of categorization on perceptual discrimination (1994)
Robert L Goldstone
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123 (2), 178
Four experiments investigated the influence of categorization training on perceptual discrimination. Ss were trained according to 1 of 4 different categorization regimes. Subsequent to category learning, Ss performed a Same–Different judgment task. Ss' sensitivities (d's) for discriminating between items that varied on category-(ir) relevant dimensions were measured. Evidence for acquired distinctiveness (increased perceptual sensitivity for items that are categorized differently) was obtained. One case of acquired equivalence (decreased perceptual sensitivity for items that are categorized together) was found for separable, but not integral, dimensions. Acquired equivalence within a categorization-relevant dimension was never found for either integral or separable dimensions. The relevance of the results for theories of perceptual learning, dimensional attention, categorical perception, and categorization are …
The role of similarity in categorization: Providing a groundwork (1994)
Robert L Goldstone
Cognition, 52 (2), 125-157
The relation between similarity and categorization has recently come under scrutiny from several sectors. The issue provides an important inroad to questions about the contributions of high-level thought and lower-level perception in the development of people's concepts. Many psychological models base categorization on similarity, assuming that things belong in the same category because of their similarity. Empirical and in-principle arguments have recently raised objections to this connection, on the grounds that similarity is too unconstrained to provide an explanation of categorization, and similarity is not sufficiently sophisticated to ground most categories. Although these objections have merit, a reassessment of evidence indicates that similarity can be sufficiently constrained and sophisticated to provide at least a partial account of many categories. Principles are discussed for incorporating similarity into …
Reuniting perception and conception (1998)
Robert L Goldstone and Lawrence W Barsalou
Cognition, 65 (2-3), 231-262
Work in philosophy and psychology has argued for a dissociation between perceptually-based similarity and higher-level rules in conceptual thought. Although such a dissociation may be justified at times, our goal is to illustrate ways in which conceptual processing is grounded in perception, both for perceptual similarity and abstract rules. We discuss the advantages, power and influences of perceptually-based representations. First, many of the properties associated with amodal symbol systems can be achieved with perceptually-based systems as well (e.g. productivity). Second, relatively raw perceptual representations are powerful because they can implicitly represent properties in an analog fashion. Third, perception naturally provides impressions of overall similarity, exactly the type of similarity useful for establishing many common categories. Fourth, perceptual similarity is not static but becomes tuned over …
Relational similarity and the nonindependence of features in similarity judgments (1991)
Robert L Goldstone, Douglas L Medin and Dedre Gentner
Cognitive psychology, 23 (2), 222-262
Four experiments examined the hypothesis that simple attributional features and relational features operate differently in the determination of similarity judgments. Forced choice similarity judgments (“Is X or Y more similar to Z?”) and similarity rating tasks demonstrate that making the same featural change in two geometric stimuli unequally affects their judged similarity to a third stimulus (the comparison stimulus). More specifically, a featural change that causes stimuli to be more superficially similar and less relationally similar increases judged similarity if it occurs in stimuli that already share many superficial attributes, and decreases similarity if it occurs in stimuli that do not share as many superficial attributes. These results argue against an assumption of feature independence which asserts that the degree to which a feature shared by two objects affects similarity is independent of the other features shared by the …
The transfer of scientific principles using concrete and idealized simulations (2005)
Robert L Goldstone and Ji Y Son
The Journal of the learning sciences, 14 (1), 69-110
Participants in 2 experiments interacted with computer simulations designed to foster understanding of scientific principles governing complex adaptive systems. The quality of participants' transportable understanding was measured by the amount of transfer between 2 simulations governed by the same principle. The perceptual concreteness of the elements within the first simulation was manipulated. The elements either remained concrete throughout the simulation, remained idealized, or switched midway into the simulation from concrete to idealized or vice versa. Transfer was better when the appearance of the elements switched, consistent with theories predicting more general schemas when the schemas are multiply instantiated. The best transfer was observed when originally concrete elements became idealized. These results are interpreted in terms of tradeoffs between grounded, concrete construals of …
Similarity, interactive activation, and mapping (1994)
Robert L Goldstone
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20 (1), 3
The question of" What makes things seem similar?" is important both for the pivotal role of similarity in theories of cognition and for an intrinsic interest in how people make comparisons. Similarity frequently involves more than listing the features of the things to be compared and comparing the lists for overlap. Often, the parts of one thing must be aligned or placed in correspondence with the parts of the other. The quantitative model with the best overall fit to human data assumes an interactive activation process whereby correspondences between the parts of compared things mutually and concurrently influence each other. An essential aspect of this model is that matching and mismatching features influence similarity more if they belong to parts that are placed in correspondence. In turn, parts are placed in correspondence if they have many features in common and if they are consistent with other developing …
Similarity (2005)
Robert L Goldstone and Ji Yun Son
Humans and other animals perceive and act on the basis of similarities among things because similarities are usually informative. Similar things usually behave similarly, and because we can grasp these similarities, we can organize and predict the things in our world. Four major classes of models have been proposed for how humans assess similarities. In geometric models, entities are represented by their positions in a multidimensional space, and similarity is based on the proximity of entities in this space. In featural models, entities are described by their features, and the similarity of entities is an increasing function of their shared features and/or a decreasing function of their unique features. In alignment-based models, the similarity between two structured entities is calculated by placing the elements of their structures into correspondence. In transformational models, the similarity between two entities is conceptualized as the number of transformations required to transform one entity into the other. We discuss issues related to the flexibility and constraints of similarity, and how similarity grounds other cognitive processes.
Computational models of collective behavior (2005)
Robert L Goldstone and Marco A Janssen
Elsevier Current Trends. 9 (9), 424-430
Computational models of human collective behavior offer promise in providing quantitative and empirically verifiable accounts of how individual decisions lead to the emergence of group-level organizations. Agent-based models (ABMs) describe interactions among individual agents and their environment, and provide a process-oriented alternative to descriptive mathematical models. Recent ABMs provide compelling accounts of group pattern formation, contagion and cooperation, and can be used to predict, manipulate and improve upon collective behavior. ABMs overcome an assumption that underlies much of cognitive science – that the individual is the crucial unit of cognition. The alternative advocated here is that individuals participate in collective organizations that they might not understand or even perceive, and that these organizations affect and are affected by individual behavior.
Altering object representations through category learning (2001)
Robert L Goldstone, Yvonne Lippa and Richard M Shiffrin
Cognition, 78 (1), 27-43
Previous research has shown that objects that are grouped together in the same category become more similar to each other and that objects that are grouped in different categories become increasingly dissimilar, as measured by similarity ratings and psychophysical discriminations. These findings are consistent with two theories of the influence of concept learning on similarity. By a Strategic Judgment Bias account, the categories associated with objects are explicitly used as cues for determining similarity, and objects that are categorized together are judged to be more similar because similarity is not only a function of the objects themselves, but also the objects' category labels. By a Changed Object Description account, category learning alters the description of the objects themselves, emphasizing properties that are relevant for categorization. A new method for distinguishing between these accounts is …
The transfer of abstract principles governing complex adaptive systems (2003)
Robert L Goldstone and Yasuaki Sakamoto
Cognitive psychology, 46 (4), 414-466
Four experiments explored participants’ understanding of the abstract principles governing computer simulations of complex adaptive systems. Experiments 1, 2, and 3 showed better transfer of abstract principles across simulations that were relatively dissimilar, and that this effect was due to participants who performed relatively poorly on the initial simulation. In Experiment 4, participants showed better abstract understanding of a simulation when it was depicted with concrete rather than idealized graphical elements. However, for poor performers, the idealized version of the simulation transferred better to a new simulation governed by the same abstraction. The results are interpreted in terms of competition between abstract and concrete construals of the simulations. Individuals prone toward concrete construals tend to overlook abstractions when concrete properties or superficial similarities are salient.
The simultaneous evolution of author and paper networks (2004)
Katy Börner, Jeegar T Maru and Robert L Goldstone
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101 (suppl 1), 5266-5273
There has been a long history of research into the structure and evolution of mankind9s scientific endeavor. However, recent progress in applying the tools of science to understand science itself has been unprecedented because only recently has there been access to high-volume and high-quality data sets of scientific output (e.g., publications, patents, grants) and computers and algorithms capable of handling this enormous stream of data. This article reviews major work on models that aim to capture and recreate the structure and dynamics of scientific evolution. We then introduce a general process model that simultaneously grows coauthor and paper citation networks. The statistical and dynamic properties of the networks generated by this model are validated against a 20-year data set of articles published in PNAS. Systematic deviations from a power law distribution of citations to papers are well fit by a model …
Transformational play as a curricular scaffold: Using videogames to support science education (2009)
Sasha A Barab, Brianna Scott, Sinem Siyahhan, Robert Goldstone, Adam Ingram-Goble, Steven J Zuiker ...
Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18 (4), 305
Drawing on game-design principles and an underlying situated theoretical perspective, we developed and researched a 3D game-based curriculum designed to teach water quality concepts. We compared undergraduate student dyads assigned randomly to four different instructional design conditions where the content had increasingly level of contextualization: (a) expository textbook condition, (b) simplistic framing condition, (c) immersive world condition, and (d) a single-user immersive world condition. Results indicated that the immersive-world dyad and immersive-world single user conditions performed significantly better than the electronic textbook group on standardized items. The immersive-world dyad condition also performed significantly better than either the expository textbook or the descriptive framing condition on a performance-based transfer task, and performed significantly better than the …
Dissertation Committee Service
Author | Dissertation Title | Committee |
---|---|---|
Alexander, Will | A Real-Time Model of Attention (September 2006) | Sporns, O. (Chair), Goldstone, R., Kruschke, J., Yaeger, L. |
Chalmers, David | Toward a Theory of Consciousness (May 1993) | Hofstadter, D. (Co-Chair), Dunn, J. (Co-Chair), van Gelder, T., Goldstone, R. |
Desai, R. | Modeling Interaction of Syntax and Semantics in Language Acquisition (December 2002) | Gasser, M. (Co-Chair), Goldstone, R. (Co-Chair), Port, R., Smith, L. |
Dimperio, Eric | A Dynamic Model of Planning Behaviors in Multi-Stage Risky Decision Tasks (August 2009) | Busemeyer, J., Goldstone, R., Kruschke, J., Scheutz, M. |
Foundalis, Harry E. | Phaeaco: A Cognitive Architecture Inspired by Bongard’s Problems (May 2006) | Hofstadter, D. (Chair), Gasser, M., Goldstone, R., Leake, D. |
Frey, Seth | Complex Collective Dynamics in Human Higher-Level Reasoning. A Study Over Multiple Methods (August 2013) | Goldstone, R. (Chair), Todd, P., Beer, R., Busemeyer, J. |
Gokcesu, Bahriye S. | Metaphor Processing and Polysemy (December 2007) | Goldstone, R. (Co-Chair), Gasser, M. (Co-Chair), Gershkoff-Stowe L., Jones, M. |
Hanania, Rima | Selective Attention and Attention Shifting in Preschool Children (August 2009) | Smith, L. (Co-Chair), Gershkoff-Stowe, L. (Co-Chair), Goldstone, R., Jones, S. |
Hockema, S. A. | Perception as Prediction (April 2004) | Gasser, M. (Co-Chair), Smith, L. (Co-Chair), Goldstone, R., Port, R., Hummel, J. |
Honey, Christopher | Fluctuations & Flows in Large-Scale Brain Networks (April 2009) | Townsend, J,. Goldstone, R. (Co-Chair), Beggs, J., Sporns, O. (Co-Chair) |
Kachergis, George Earle | Mechanisms for Cross-Situational Learning of Word-Referent Mappings: Empirical and Modeling Evidence (December 2012) | Shiffrin, R. (Co-Chair), Yu, C. (Co-Chair), Goldstone, R., Jones, M., Kruschke, J. |
Loehrlein, Aaron | Priming Effects Associated with the Hierarchical Levels Of Classification Systems (March 2012) | Jacob, E. (Co-Chair), Goldstone, R. (Co-Chair), Ekbia, H., Ding, Y. |
Mahabal, Abhijit | Seqsee: A Concept-Centered Architecture for Sequence Perception (March 2010) | Hofstadter, D. (Chair), Gasser, M., Goldstone, R., Leake, D. |
Mason, Winter | Implicit Social Influence (August 2007) | Smith, E. (Co-Chair), Goldstone, R. (Co-Chair), Tormala, Z., Sporns, O. |
McGraw, G. E. Jr. | Letter Spirit (Part One): Emergent High-Level Perception of Letters Using Fluid Concepts (September 1995) | Hofstadter, D. R. (Chair), Gasser, M. Goldstone, R., Port, R. F., Rawlins, G. J. E. |
Nelson, Angela | Examining the Co-Evolution of Knowledge and Event Memory (August 2009) | Shiffrin, R. (Co-Chair), Goldstone, R. (Co-Chair), Busey, T., James, K. |
Paik, Jae H | Fraction Concepts: A Complex System of Mappings (May 2005) | Mix, K. (Co-Chair), Gasser, M., Goldstone, R. (Co-Chair), Smith, L. |
Place, Skyler | Non-Independent Mate Choice in Humans: Deciphering And Utilizing Information in a Social Environment (July 2010) | Todd, P. (Co-Chair), Goldstone, R. (Co-Chair), Smith, E., Wasserman, S., West, M. |
Recchia, Gabriel | Investigating the Semantics of Abstract Concepts: Evidence From a Property Generation Game (December 2012) | Jones, M. (Chair), Goldstone, R., Kubler, S., Todd, P. |
Rehling, J. A. | Letter Spirit (Part Two): Modeling Creativity in A Visual Domain (July 2001) | Hofstadter, D. R. (Chair), Gasser, M., Goldstone, R., Port, R. F. |
Roberts, Michael | Human Collective Behavior: Complex systems properties of self-organizations, coordination, and emergent. (July 2008) | Goldstone, R. (Co-Chair), Ostrom, E. (Co-Chair), Smith, E., Todd, P. |
Ross, Travis | Steering Social Behavior in Online Video Games: A Calibration and Test of The Rational Reconstruction of Norms in a Multiplayer Dungeon Crawl (November 2013) | Castronova, E. (Chair), Lang, A., Goldstone, R., Weaver, A. |
Shayan, Shakila | Emergence of Roles in English Canonical Transitive Construction (June 2008) | Gasser, M. (Co-Chair), Gershkoff-Stowe, L. (Co-Chair), Leake, D., Goldstone, R., Smith, L. |
Son, Ji Y. | Forces of Contextualization and Decontextualization: A Look at Symbols, Experience, and Language (August 2007) | Goldstone, R. (Co-Chair), Smith, L (Co-Chair), Gasser, M., Yu, C. |
Stanton, Roger | Dissociations of Classification: Evidence against the Multiple Learning-Systems Hypothesis (August 2007) | Nosofsky, R. (Chair), Goldstone, R., James, T., Kruschke, J. |
Tamara, Carolina | Route Learning And Its Interaction With Visual Landmarks (May 2013) | Timberlake, W. (chair), Crystal, J., Goldstone, R., Todd, P. |
Theiner, G | From Extended Minds to Group Minds: Rethinking The Boundaries of the Mental | Goldstone, R. (Co-Chair), O'Connor, T. (Co-Chair) |
Theiner, Georg | From Extened Minds to Group Minds: Rethinking The Boundaries Of The Mental (July 2008) | O’Connor, T. (Co-Chair), Goldstone, R. (Co-Chair), Schmitt, R., Weinberg, J. |
Thomas, Wisdom | Incentives, Innovation, and Imitation: Social Learning in a Networked Group (August 2010) | Goldstone, R. (Co-Chair), Ostrom, E. (Co-Chair), Collins, K., Gold, J., Smith, E. |
Vigo, Ronaldo | Mathematical Principles of Boolean Concept Learning (May 2008) | Allen, C. (Co-Chair), Kruschke, J. (Co-Chair), Goldstone, R., Nosofsky, R., Townsend, J. |
Weidemann, Christophe | Identifying brief stimuli: Perceptual, preferential, and decisional aspects (August 2006) | Shiffrin, R. (Chair), Gold, J., Goldstone, R., Todd, P. |