Rick Hullinger Profile Picture

Rick Hullinger

  • rahullin@indiana.edu
  • Pyschology Building A300B
  • (812) 856-6854
  • Senior Lecturer
    Psychological and Brain Sciences
  • Director
    Pedagogy

Field of study

  • Evolution of Attention; Genetic algorithms and simulated evolution; The use of technology in undergraduate instruction

Education

  • Ph.D., Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Science, Indiana University, 2011
  • B.S., Computer Science, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 1996
  • B.S., Physics, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 1996

Research interests

  • As an instructor, I am deeply interested in studying pedagogical issues in post-secondary education. Specifically, I am drawn towards the interface between technology and the classroom – electronic textbooks, student response systems, internet access during class time, interactive applets, etc. – and the effects that technology can have on learning.

Professional Experience

  • P101/P102 - Introduction to Psychology
  • P199 - Careers in Psychology
  • P211 - Methods of Experimental Psychology
  • P335 - Cognitive Psychology
  • K300 - Statistical Techniques
  • C105 - Brains & Minds, Robots & Computers

Awards

  • College of Arts and Sciences Trustees Teaching Award – Indiana University, 2014
  • Outstanding Teaching Award (Graduate Student), Cognitive Science - Indiana University, 2011
  • Award for Outstanding Teaching by a Graduate Student in Psychology - Indiana University, 2009

Representative publications

Evolution of attention in learning. In: N. Schmajuk (Ed.), Computational Models of Classical Conditioning (2010)
Kruschke, J.K., & Hullinger, R.H.
Cambridge University Press.. 10 – 52

An Evolutionary Analysis of Learned Attention (2014)
Richard A. Hullinger, John K. Kruschke, Peter M. Todd
Cognitive Science A Multidisciplinary Journal, 39 (9),

Humans and many other species selectively attend to stimuli or stimulus dimensions—but why should an animal constrain information input in this way? To investigate the adaptive functions of attention, we used a genetic algorithm to evolve simple connectionist networks that had to make categorization decisions in a variety of environmental structures. The results of these simulations show that while learned attention is not universally adaptive, its benefit is not restricted to the reduction of input complexity in order to keep it within an organism's processing capacity limitations. Instead, being able to shift attention provides adaptive benefit by allowing faster learning with fewer errors in a range of ecologically plausible environments.

Edit your profile